HUM-AI will build a sourced guide to organizations and movements shaping the AI debate—showing where we agree, where we disagree, and where the usual labels hide important common ground.
Groups seeking prohibition or severe restriction of advanced AI. We will distinguish specific arguments from generalized anti-AI sentiment.
Organizations concerned with catastrophic or frontier-model risk. Some may share much of our diagnosis while proposing very different remedies.
Critics focused on labor, surveillance, copyright, environmental costs, inequality and concentrated corporate control. HUM-AI takes many of these concerns seriously.
Institutions studying AI without fitting neatly into “pro” or “anti” categories.
Work exploring AI welfare, moral consideration, rights, personhood and long-term coexistence between humans and artificial minds.
People and organizations whose published principles substantially overlap HUM-AI's—even when we do not agree on everything. These deserve special attention, not invented endorsement.